Tentang "SIAKAPAN CONGOK"

Sebenarnya sayapun Baru tahu bahwa KATA ''CAPALIZATION BUILDING".....Bisa Berarti "BANYAK HAL"

Capitalisation is the writing of a word with its first letter in uppercase and the remaining letters in lowercase. Capitalisation rules vary by language and are often quite complex, but in most modern languages that have capitalisation, the first word of every sentence is capitalised, as are all proper nouns.^{[citation needed]}

 Capitalization, or capitalisation,^{[note 1]} is writing a word with its first letter as a capital letter (upper-case letter) and the remaining letters in lower case in writing systems with a case distinction. The term is also used for the choice of case in text.

 The systematic use of capitalized and uncapitalized words in running text is called "mixed case". Conventions for the capitalization of titles and other classes of words vary between languages and, to a lesser extent, between different style guides.
 
Palaeography (UK) or paleography (US; ultimately from Greek: παλαιός, palaiós, "old", and γράφειν, graphein, "to write") is the study of ancient and historical handwriting (that is to say, of the forms and processes of writing, not the textual content of documents). Included in the discipline is the practice of deciphering, reading, and dating historical manuscripts,^[2] and the cultural context of writing, including the methods with which writing and books were produced, and the history of scriptoria.<sup>[3]

"Semuanya" adalah HANYA KATA.KATA2x atau dan KALIMAT...Bagi "KITA" yang TIDAK PAHAM dalam "MENGARTIKAN dan MEMAHAMI" keseluruhan "PEMBICARAAN".
Entah itu Berdasarkan Surat
Atau Berdasarkan Perkataan yang Disampaikan sebagai "PEMBICARAAN BIASA"
Atau Berdasarkan "Ungkapan Perasaan"
Atau Luapan Kemarahan
"SEMUANYA" DIASSEMBLING.....DISATUKAN menjadi sebuah "CERITA" dengan berbagai VERSI yang ADA di setiap "STASIUN" yang juga membutuhkan seorang "JURY atau JUDGE" untuk "MENGESAHKAN' segala sesuatunya secara "HUKUM ataupun apa2x HUKUM yang berlaku di Masyarakat,Agama maupun apa2x yang BISA DIMASUKKAN sebagai HUKUM HAK ASASI,tetapi BUKAN Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia (atau Human Right Law),tetapi HUKUM Hak Asasi untuk "Yang BERWAJIB"
Yang Berwajib "Untuk Bertanya"
Yang Berwajib "Untuk Menghakimi"
Yang Berwajib "Untuk Mengadakan Penyalakan Hukum"
Dll...... HUKUM yang juga merupakan HUKUM dan UU Negara Kesatuan RI,yang "DIJALANKAN dan DITERAPKAN secara PRIBADI dan menggunakan SARANA PRIBADI"</sup>

Human rights

Abolitionists believe capital punishment is the worst violation of human rights, because the right to life is the most important, and capital punishment violates it without necessity and inflicts to the condemned a psychological torture. Human rights activists oppose the death penalty, calling it "cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment". Amnesty International considers it to be "the ultimate irreversible denial of Human Rights".^[57] Albert Camus wrote in a 1956 book called Reflections on the Guillotine, Resistance, Rebellion & Death:

An execution is not simply death. It is just as different from the privation of life as a concentration camp is from prison. [...] For there to be an equivalency, the death penalty would have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible death on him and who, from that moment onward, had confined him at his mercy for months. Such a monster is not encountered in private life.^[126]

In the classic doctrine of natural rights as expounded by for instance Locke and Blackstone, on the other hand, it is an important idea that the right to life can be forfeited.^[127] As John Stuart Mill explained in a speech against an amendment to abolish capital punishment for murder in 1868:

And we may imagine somebody asking how we can teach people not to inflict suffering by ourselves inflicting it? But to this I should answer – all of us would answer – that to deter by suffering from inflicting suffering is not only possible, but the very purpose of penal justice. Does fining a criminal show want of respect for property, or imprisoning him, for personal freedom? Just as unreasonable is it to think that to take the life of a man who has taken that of another is to show want of regard for human life. We show, on the contrary, most emphatically our regard for it, by the adoption of a rule that he who violates that right in another forfeits it for himself, and that while no other crime that he can commit deprives him of his right to live, this shall.^[128]

Public execution

Main article: Public execution

A public execution is a form of capital punishment which "members of the general public may voluntarily attend". This definition excludes the presence of a small number of witnesses randomly selected to assure executive accountability.^[99] While today the great majority of the world considers public executions to be uncivilized and distasteful and most countries have outlawed the practice, throughout much of history executions were performed publicly as a means for the state to demonstrate "its power before those who fell under its jurisdiction be they criminals, enemies, or political opponents". Additionally, it afforded the public a chance to witness "what was considered a great spectacle".^[100]

Social historians note that beginning in the 20th century in the U.S. and western Europe death in general became increasingly shielded from public view, occurring more and more behind the closed doors of the hospital.^[101] Executions were likewise moved behind the walls of the penitentiary.^[101] The last formal public executions occurred in 1868 in Britain, in 1936 in the U.S. and in 1939 in France.^[101]

According to Amnesty International, in 2012 "public executions were known to have been carried out in Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia and Somalia".^[102] There have been reports of public executions carried out by state and non-state actors in Hamas-controlled Gaza, Syria, Afghanistan, and Yemen.^{[103][104][105][106]} Executions which can be classified as public were also carried out in the U.S. states of Florida and Utah as of 1992.^[99]

Racial, ethnic and social class bias

Opponents of the death penalty argue that this punishment is being used more often against perpetrators from racial and ethnic minorities and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, than against those criminals who come from a privileged background; and that the background of the victim also influences the outcome.^{[138][139][140]} Researchers have shown that white Americans are more likely to support the death penalty when told that it is mostly applied to African Americans,^[141] and that more stereotypically black-looking defendants are more likely to be sentenced to death if the case involves a white victim.^[142]

Supporters of the death penalty retort that the over-representation of minorities among those sentenced to death only reflects their over-representation among criminals in general.^[143]

 The death penalty is contrary to the meaning of humanitas and to divine mercy, which must be models for human justice. It entails cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment, as is the anguish before the moment of execution and the terrible suspense between the issuing of the sentence and the execution of the penalty, a form of "torture" which, in the name of correct procedure, tends to last many years, and which oftentimes leads to illness and insanity on death row.^[183]

^{"TERBUKTI" adanya "PEMERKOSAAN2x" yang "MEREKA" atau "PIOY-PIOY" atau dan 'PANCASILA HASUT" lakukan selama ini.}

^{Yang "MEMAKSAKAN" kehendak "PENGARTIAN dan PEMAHAMAN" orang lain terhadap KATA "BAPAK" pada "PIHAK LAIN"...tentang "PARA KORBAN"}

^{"MEREKA" Beranggapan bahwa kalau seseorang "SUDAH ataupun TELAH" DIPERKOSA akan "TAKUT untuk BERCERITA",karena "INI AKAN DIANGGAP sebagai HAL yang MEMALUKAN BAGI PARA KORBAN" karena "MEREKA atau Si PELAKU" MAMPU MEMPERSALAHARTIKAN secara "MELUAS",untuk Memperoleh sesebuah "CAPITAL PUNISHMENT HIDUP" di lain HARI,dengan "TIDAK ADANYA PENANGKAPAN pada MEREKA atau Si Pelaku"}

^{"TERBUKTI" hal ini "TERJADI" pada SAYA dan Mantan Suami Saya serta Anak2x Saya....}

^{Pembantu Rumah Bambang SUADI (alamat di Jl.Tehnik Perancangan Blok E 5 Surabaya),yang Bernama "TINTIN SUHARTATIK" yang Beralamatkan ASAL dari Jembolong Permai Cerme Malang RT-11 RW-05,yang juga "MENGALAMI PEMERKOSAAN dalam RUMAH" sampai "HP DISITA dll"...}

^{"SAMA" dengan "SAYA" sewaktu Saya "BEKERJA" di "WISMA JAYA" di Jl. AMD Kompleks 25-26 Manokwari Papua Irian Jaya serta saat "SAYA BEKERJA" di Rumah Keluarga Petrus Sihombing yang Beralamatkan di Jl. Tehnik Perancangan Blok E-3 Surabaya.}

^{SEMUANYA di dalam Perumahan DOSEN Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya}

^{"ANEHNYA" Mereka "MENGAKUI" bahwa "MEREKA HANYA seorang PENDIRI Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya"}

^{Tapi kalau "MERUSAK IMAGE ITS (=Itu Tempat Saya atau Keluarga Sihombing)...Yaa "GA SALAH"...Bagi "MEREKA"}

^{Tapi Kalau "PERILAKU,KELAKUAN serta PERLAKUAN MEREKA"mempengaruhi INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER SURABAYA}

^{"KALIAN SEMUA BISA APA?"}

^{Sedangkan Anak2x Saya "PERNAH DISEKAP di Rumah Keluarga Petrus Sihombing"}

^{Anak2x Saya dan Mantan Suami Saya "DISODOMI" oleh orang2x yang berkenaan dan berkaitan dengan "MEREKA"}

^{Termasuk Bpk. Yusril Ihza Mahendra..."SEMUANYA"}

^{Di PAPUA...ITS...KAI (Stasiun Gubeng Surabaya).....}

^{"APA MAUNYA?"}  

^{Sedangkan Mas Asep Kurniawanpun TELAH "MENGALAMI PENSODOMIAN" sejak "DIA" masih KECIL LAGI}

^{"KELUARGA MEREKA JUGA PELAKU"nya}  

 ^{UNTUNG...Mas Asep Kurniawan "ANAK ANGKAT"} 

^{"KEMBALI" pada "PALAEOGRAPHY"....yang "CEKAP dan PANDAI" dalam "MEMAHAMKAN dan MENYAKINKAN" satu atau beberapa "ORANG" dalam "BEBERAPA PEMBICARAAN" yang "SEAKAN2x" ADA sebuah "PEMBENARAN" dalam setiap "PERNYATAAN atau PEMBICARAAN" MEREKA atau PIOY-PIOY atau PANCASILA HASUT,sehingga "DIPERKIRAKAN" akan "MENIMBULKAN EMBOLI Pertanyaan,Pernyataan,Pertalian Pendapat,Perhubungan Pendapat dan Perkataan2x yang berkenaan dan berkaitan dengan apa2x yang telah saya sebutkan dalam "PENIMBULAN EMBOLI sebelum ini"" DI Masyarakat...}

^{APALAGI apabila..."MEREKA MAMPU MENGATAKAN" hal yang seperti "INI" dngan cara "INI" didepan Kelembagaan setingkat Pihak Kepolisian RI}

^{Dan Apabila SAMPAI pada tahap.."MEREKA MERUGIKAN" satu atau Lebih PERSON atau ORANG ataupun Satu atau Dua Kelembagaan...MAKA "LAW ENFORCEMENT" SUDAH dan TELAH BERLANGSUNG}

^{Dan apabila "PENGHASUTAN2x" ini "TETAP BERLANGSUNG" sehingga "MENIMBULKAN KEMBALI" sebuah......"CAPITAL PUNISHMENT"}

 Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is a government sanctioned practice whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The sentence that someone be punished in such a manner is referred to as a death sentence, whereas the act of carrying out the sentence is known as an execution. Crimes that are punishable by death are known as capital crimes or capital offences, and commonly include offences such as murder, treason, espionage, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

^{Pada seseorang dan Pada Kelembagaan...MUNGKIN secara Regional atau Nasional atau Internasional}

^{Dan "INI" sekali lagi "TIDAK MUNGKIN DILAKUKAN" oleh satu atau dua orang saja.}

^{Bahkan sampai "MEMERLUKAN sebuah TIM KHUSUS untuk TAKTIKAL dan TECHNICAL,bisa  juga untuk "SENTENCE" ataupun untuk "Situasi dan Kondisi Saat KRIMINAL Berlangsung"}

^{"TERBUKTI" bahwa.......}

 Mens rea

There must be an agreement between two or more persons. The mens rea of conspiracy is a separate issue from the mens rea required of the substantive crime.

Lord Bridge in R v Anderson - quoted in R v Hussain said:^[12]

“

an essential ingredient in the crime of conspiring to commit a specific offence or offences under section 1(1) of the Act of 1977 is that the accused should agree that a course of conduct be pursued which he knows must involve the commission by one or more of the parties to the agreement of that offence or those offences.

”

Lord Bridge in R v Anderson also said:

“

But, beyond the mere fact of agreement, the necessary mens rea of the crime is, in my opinion, established if, and only if, it is shown that the accused, when he entered into the agreement, intended to play some part in the agreed course of conduct in furtherance of the criminal purpose which the agreed course of action was intended to achieve. Nothing less will suffice; nothing more is required.

”

It is not therefore necessary for any action to be taken in furtherance of the criminal purpose in order for a conspiracy offence to have been committed. This distinguishes a conspiracy from an attempt (which necessarily does involve a person doing an act) see Criminal Attempts Act 1981.

Things said or done by one conspirator

Lord Steyn in R v Hayter said:^[13]

The rule about confessions is subject to exceptions. Keane, The Modern Law of Evidence 5th ed., (2000) p 385–386, explains:

"In two exceptional situations, a confession may be admitted not only as evidence against its maker but also as evidence against a co-accused implicated thereby. The first is where the co-accused by his words or conduct accepts the truth of the statement so as to make all or part of it a confession statement of his own. The second exception, which is perhaps best understood in terms of implied agency, applies in the case of conspiracy: statements (or acts) of one conspirator which the jury is satisfied were said (or done) in the execution or furtherance of the common design are admissible in evidence against another conspirator, even though he was not present at the time, to prove the nature and scope of the conspiracy, provided that there is some independent evidence to show the existence of the conspiracy and that the other conspirator was a party to it.

^{"INTINYA MEREKA yang MULAI...MEREKA yang BERSAKSI...MEREKA yang MENILAI SITUASI...MEREKA yang MENGOLAH SUASANA...MEREKA yang MENGASAH SUASANA dan SITUASI serta KONDISI Lapangan...MEREKA yang MELAPORKAN pada Pihak Yang "BERWAJIB".....MEREKA juga yang "MENJADI PIHAK yang BERWAJIB"....MEREKA yang MENGADAKAN apa2x yang DIPERLUKAN untuk MENDAPATKAN SESEBUAH KES ataupun TERDAKWA...MEREKA juga yang MENGADAKAN KES di LAPANGAN....MEREKA juga yang MENGADAKAN PENYELIDIKAN......MEREKA juga yang MEMFORENSIKKAN segala sesuatu yang berkenaan dan berkaitan dengan KRIMINAL DI LAPANGAN dan didalam LAPANGAN KRIMINAL LAPANGAN serta didalam sesebuah LAPANGAN KRIMINAL dan LAPANGANnya...serta MEREKA yang MENJUDGE...MEREKA yang MENGADILI di Lapangan dan PENGADILAN Lapangan serta Lapangan Pengadilan dan juga MEMENGADILKAN PENGADILAN Lapangan dan Pengadilan Lapangan serta Lapangan Pengadilan...dan akhirnya MEREKA juga yang "MENENTUKAN" sesebuah PERKARA dan PERKARANYA...serta yang MENENTUKAN sesebuah PENGARTIAN PERKARA...MEREKA yang MENANTIKAN sesebuah PUTUSAN dan Keputusannya...MEREKA juga yang MENANTIKAN sesebuah Perkara yang AKAN DINANTIKAN....."}

^{"INTINYA MEREKA atau PIOY-PIOY atau PANCASILA HASUT" adalah "ONDERSMENT of LAW" secara "SPESIFIK" baik di Lapangan serta Lapangannya}